[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180919135741.5icpyesntcfbgtcr@mwanda>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 16:57:42 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Gary R Hook <ghook@....com>
Cc: "Natarajan, Janakarajan" <Janakarajan.Natarajan@....com>,
"linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>,
"Hook, Gary" <Gary.Hook@....com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Singh, Brijesh" <brijesh.singh@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Fix static checker warning
Sounds reasonable. The subject needs a subsystem prefix and it might
be better to make it more specific. Like so:
[PATCH 1/2] crypto: ccp - potential uninitialized variable
I don't know if Herbert fixes those things up himself normally?
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists