[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180919150148.GA29588@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 17:01:48 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: dma_get_required_mask tidyups
Any comments? I have a a few things piled up that base on this, so
some forward progress would be great.
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 08:13:29AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> the dma_get_required_mask dma API implementation has always been a little
> odd, in that we by default don't wire it up struct dma_map_ops, but
> instead hard code a default implementation. powerpc and ia64 override
> this default and either call a method or otherwise duplicate the default.
>
> This series always enabled the method and just falls back to the previous
> default implementation when it is not available, as well as fixing up
> a few bits in the default implementations. This already allows removing
> the ia64 override of the implementation, and will also allow to remove
> the powerpc one together with a few additional cleanups in the powerpc
> code, but those will be sent separately with other powerpc DMA API
> patches. Last but not least the method will allow us to return a more
> sensible value for typical iommu dma_ops eventually, but that is left
> to another series as well.
> _______________________________________________
> iommu mailing list
> iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
---end quoted text---
Powered by blists - more mailing lists