[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180919023932.GA14090@jagdpanzerIV>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 11:39:32 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To: He Zhe <zhe.he@...driver.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
pmladek@...e.com, sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] printk: Fix panic caused by passing log_buf_len
to command line
On (09/19/18 10:27), He Zhe wrote:
> On 2018年09月19日 09:50, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > On (09/19/18 01:17), zhe.he@...driver.com wrote:
> >> @@ -1048,7 +1048,14 @@ static void __init log_buf_len_update(unsigned size)
> >> /* save requested log_buf_len since it's too early to process it */
> >> static int __init log_buf_len_setup(char *str)
> >> {
> >> - unsigned size = memparse(str, &str);
> >> + unsigned size;
> > unsigned int size;
>
> This is in v1 but then Steven suggested that it should be split out
> and only keep the pure fix part here.
Ah, I see.
Hmm... memparse() returns u64 value. A user *probably* can ask the kernel
to allocate log_buf larger than 'unsigned int'.
So may be I'd do two fixes here:
First - switch to u64 size.
Second - check for NULL str.
Steven, Petr, what do you think?
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists