[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7fa897cf-4d58-c63f-afdd-a3ec5a6a56bf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 13:55:10 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@...il.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
BCM Kernel Feedback <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@...il.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/12] PCI: brcmstb: add dma-range mapping for inbound
traffic
On 09/19/2018 07:19 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 19 September 2018 at 07:31, Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@...il.com> wrote:
>> The Broadcom STB PCIe host controller is intimately related to the
>> memory subsystem. This close relationship adds complexity to how cpu
>> system memory is mapped to PCIe memory. Ideally, this mapping is an
>> identity mapping, or an identity mapping off by a constant. Not so in
>> this case.
>>
>> Consider the Broadcom reference board BCM97445LCC_4X8 which has 6 GB
>> of system memory. Here is how the PCIe controller maps the
>> system memory to PCIe memory:
>>
>> memc0-a@[ 0....3fffffff] <=> pci@[ 0....3fffffff]
>> memc0-b@[100000000...13fffffff] <=> pci@[ 40000000....7fffffff]
>> memc1-a@[ 40000000....7fffffff] <=> pci@[ 80000000....bfffffff]
>> memc1-b@[300000000...33fffffff] <=> pci@[ c0000000....ffffffff]
>> memc2-a@[ 80000000....bfffffff] <=> pci@[100000000...13fffffff]
>> memc2-b@[c00000000...c3fffffff] <=> pci@[140000000...17fffffff]
>>
>
> So is describing this as
>
> dma-ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x40000000>,
> <0x0 0x40000000 0x1 0x0 0x0 0x40000000>,
> <0x0 0x80000000 0x0 0x40000000 0x0 0x40000000>,
> <0x0 0xc0000000 0x3 0x0 0x0 0x40000000>,
> <0x1 0x0 0x0 0x80000000 0x0 0x40000000>,
> <0x1 0x40000000 0x0 0xc0000000 0x0 0x40000000>;
>
> not working for you? I haven't tried this myself, but since DT permits
> describing the inbound mappings this way, we should fix the code if it
> doesn't work at the moment.
You mean encoding the memory controller index in the first cell? If that
works, that's indeed a much cleaner solution, though is it standard
compliant in any form?
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists