[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN6PR21MB01614DCE1099980A7B1286FFCA130@BN6PR21MB0161.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 20:56:46 +0000
From: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
CC: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"olaf@...fle.de" <olaf@...fle.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
vkuznets <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next, 1/3] hv_netvsc: Add support for LRO/RSC in the
vSwitch
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2018 4:48 PM
> To: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...uxonhyperv.com>
> Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>; davem@...emloft.net;
> netdev@...r.kernel.org; olaf@...fle.de; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> devel@...uxdriverproject.org; vkuznets <vkuznets@...hat.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next, 1/3] hv_netvsc: Add support for LRO/RSC in the
> vSwitch
>
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 17:06:59 +0000
> Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...uxonhyperv.com> wrote:
>
> > +static inline void rsc_add_data
> > + (struct netvsc_channel *nvchan,
> > + const struct ndis_pkt_8021q_info *vlan,
> > + const struct ndis_tcp_ip_checksum_info *csum_info,
> > + void *data, u32 len)
> > +{
>
> Could this be changed to look more like a function and skip the inline.
> The compiler will end up inlining it anyway.
>
> static void rsc_add_data(struct netvsc_channel *nvchan,
How about this?
static inline
void rsc_add_data(struct netvsc_channel *nvchan,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists