linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add API to retrieve the Bluetooth Device Address (BD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 20 Sep 2018 18:45:58 -0400
From:   Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
To:     Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
        Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
        Balakrishna Godavarthi <bgodavar@...eaurora.org>,
        Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...aro.org>,
        Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add API to retrieve the Bluetooth Device Address
 (BD_ADDR)

On 9/20/2018 6:34 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> On some systems the Bluetooth Device Address (BD_ADDR) isn't stored
> on the Bluetooth chip itself. One way to configure the BD address is
> through the device tree. The btqcomsmd driver is an example, it can
> read the BD address from the DT property 'local-bd-address'. It is
> also planned to extend the hci_qca driver to support setting the BD
> address through the DT.
> 
> To avoid redundant open-coded reading of 'local-bd-address' and error
> handling this series adds an API to retrieve the BD address of a device
> and adapts the btqcomsmd driver to use this API.

I don't think you have got enough number of line savings to make this
code to be folded into property.c

Not my call but seems redundant IMO.