[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVoFQpLntp-aygO-T818BFb4-ybXa3FLkFKJxCpdw6m=w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 09:16:36 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Trent Piepho <tpiepho@...inj.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: amba: Fix leak of driver_override attribute value
Hi Greg,
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 9:09 AM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 08:48:36AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 1:48 AM Trent Piepho <tpiepho@...inj.com> wrote:
> > > If driver_override was set when a device was released the string would
> > > not be kfree'ed in amba_device_release and thus leaked when the amba
> > > device was freed.
> > >
> > > Cc: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
> > > Cc: Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>
> > > Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> > > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Trent Piepho <tpiepho@...inj.com>
> >
> > Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> > Fixes: 3cf385713460eb2b ("ARM: 8256/1: driver coamba: add device
> > binding path 'driver_override'")
>
> Then it should also have a cc: stable, right?
Perhaps. I usually leave that up to the maintainer, else git send-email sends
it to stable immediately.
The modern backporting AI will consider it anyway, due to the subject, and
the Fixes tag, right?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists