[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180920090222.GA17617@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 10:02:22 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Alan Douglas <adouglas@...ence.com>,
Subrahmanya Lingappa <l.subrahmanya@...iveil.co.in>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: remove unnecessary check of device_type == pci
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 05:33:01PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 12:05:40PM -0700, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 7:51 AM Lorenzo Pieralisi
> > <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 01:34:40PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > > PCI host drivers have already matched on compatible strings, so checking
> > > > device_type is redundant. Also, device_type is considered deprecated for
> > > > FDT though we've still been requiring it for PCI hosts as it is useful
> > > > for finding PCI buses.
> > >
> > > Hi Rob,
> > >
> > > I have no problem with the patch per-se, I can't parse though the second
> > > paragraph, in particular what you mean by "useful for finding PCI
> > > buses".
> >
> > Device_type is the only generic way we can identify PCI buses which is
> > useful for dtc for example to do PCI binding checks. Maybe we can use
> > the node name which is what I'm doing for cpu nodes, but we've been
> > less consistent about that for PCI.
> >
> > >
> > > What about the corresponding dts files ? I suspect we had better leave
> > > them alone lest we can trigger regressions with new dts and older
> > > kernels.
> >
> > Yes. it will take some time before we can remove from dts files. Or
> > maybe only new ones change.
>
> OK, thanks. What about PCI host controllers bindings ? I assume we leave
> the bindings (that enforce device_type) unchanged too.
>
> If Will and Michal have no objections I will queue this patch as-is
> for v4.20.
Fine by me!
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists