lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fb81b8d5-3d24-b413-8d59-33cb70e46f8b@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Thu, 20 Sep 2018 18:33:31 +0530
From:   Sricharan R <sricharan@...eaurora.org>
To:     Craig <ctatlor97@...il.com>, mark.rutland@....com, robh@...nel.org,
        sudeep.holla@....com, linux@....linux.org.uk, rjw@...ysocki.net,
        viresh.kumar@...aro.org, mturquette@...libre.com,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, sboyd@...eaurora.org,
        linux@...linux.org.uk, thierry.escande@...aro.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, david.brown@...aro.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        andy.gross@...aro.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        niklas.cassel@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V12 00/14] Krait clocks + Krait CPUfreq



On 9/20/2018 1:54 AM, Craig wrote:
> Yup, this patch seems to have fixed the higher frequencies from the quick test I did.
>
      Thanks !!. Can i take that as 
          Tested-by: Craig Tatlor <ctatlor97@...il.com>  ?

Regards,
 Sricharan
 
> On 7 September 2018 15:28:53 BST, Craig Tatlor <ctatlor97@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7 September 2018 10:57:34 BST, Sricharan R
>> <sricharan@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>>> Hi Craig,
>>>
>>>
>>>>> [v12]
>>>>>   * Added my signed-off that was missing in some patches.
>>>>>   * Added Bjorn's acked that i missed earlier.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   Can you give this a try on your 8974 device and check if the
>>>>   pvs version reporting, scaling for higher frequencies are fine ?
>>>>   Sorry, i could not get hold of a 8974 device. So in-case if you
>>> still
>>>>   have the issues with higher frequencies, can you give a quick
>> debug
>>>>   and report. That would be of great help.
>>>>
>>>   Ping on this ..
>>
>> Hi, didn't see your last message,
>>
>> Will have a try on mine in the weekend and report back.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Sricharan
>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>  Sricharan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> [v11]
>>>>>   * Dropped patch 13 and 14 from v10 and
>>>>>     merged the qcom-cpufreq-krait driver to the existing
>>> qcom-cpufreq-kryo.c
>>>>>   * Rebased on top of clk-next
>>>>>   * Fixed a bug while populating the pvs version for krait.
>>>>>
>>>>> [v10]
>>>>>   * Addressed Stephen's comments to add clocks bindings properties
>>>>>     to the newly introduced nodes.
>>>>>   * Added a change to include opp-supported-hw to qcom-cpufreq.c
>>>>>   * Rebased on top of clk-next
>>>>>   * Although there were minor changes to bindings and the driver
>>>>>     retained the acked-by tags from Rob and Viresh respectively.   
>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [v9]
>>>>>   * Fixed a rebase issue in Makefile and added Tag from Robh.
>>>>>
>>>>> [v8]
>>>>>   * Fixed a bug in path#14 pointed out by Viresh and also added
>>> tags.
>>>>>     No change in any other patch.
>>>>>
>>>>> [v7]
>>>>>   * Fixed comments from Viresh for cleaning up the error handling
>>>>>     in qcom-cpufreq.c. Also changed the init function to lateinit
>>>>>     call. This is required because nvmem which gets initialised
>> with
>>>>>     module_init needs to go first.
>>>>>   * Fixed Rob's comments for bindings documentation
>>>>>   * Fixed kbuild build issue in clk-lpc32xx.c
>>>>>   * Rebased on top of clk-next
>>>>>
>>>>> [v6]
>>>>>   * Adrressed comments from Viresh for patch #14 in v5 [5]
>>>>>   * Introduced a new binding operating-points-v2-krait-cpu
>>>>>     as per discussion with Rob
>>>>>   * Added Review tags
>>>>>
>>>>> [v5]
>>>>>   * Addressed comments from Rob for bindings
>>>>>   * Addressed comments from Viresh to use dev_pm_opp_set_prop_name,
>>> accordingly
>>>>>     dropped patch #12 and corrected patch #11 from previous patch
>>> set in [4]
>>>>>   * Converted to use #spdx tags for newly introduced files
>>>>>
>>>>> Mostly a resend of the v3 posted by Stephen quite some time back
>> [1]
>>>>> except for few changes.
>>>>>   Based on reading some feedback from list,
>>>>>   * Dropped the patch "clk: Add safe switch hook" from v3 [2].
>>>>>     Now this is taken care by patch#10 in this series only for
>>> Krait.
>>>>>   * Dropped the path "clk: Avoid sending high rates to downstream
>>>>> 		      clocks during set_rate" from v3 [3].
>>>>>   * Rebased on top of clk-next.
>>>>>   * Dropped the DT update from the series. Will send separately
>>>>>   * Now with cpufreq-dt+opp supporting voltage scaling, registering
>>> the
>>>>>     krait cpu supplies in DT should be sufficient. But one issue
>> is,
>>>>>     the qcom-cpufreq drivers reads the efuse and based on that
>>> registers
>>>>>     the opp data and then registers the cpufreq-dt device. So when
>>>>>     cpufreq-dt driver probes and registers the regulator to the OPP
>>> framework,
>>>>>     it expects that the opp data for the device should not be
>>> registered before
>>>>>     the regulator. Will send a RFC patch removing that check, to
>>> find out the
>>>>>     right way of doing it.
>>>>>
>>>>> These patches provide cpufreq scaling on devices with Krait CPUs.
>>>>> In Krait CPU designs there's one PLL and two muxes per CPU,
>> allowing
>>>>> us to switch CPU frequencies independently.
>>>>>
>>>>> 				 secondary
>>>>> 	 +-----+                    +
>>>>> 	 | QSB |-------+------------|\
>>>>> 	 +-----+       |            | |-+
>>>>> 		       |    +-------|/  |
>>>>> 		       |    |       +   |
>>>>> 	 +-----+       |    |           |
>>>>> 	 | PLL |----+-------+           |   primary
>>>>> 	 +-----+    |  |                |     +
>>>>> 		    |  |                +-----|\       +------+
>>>>> 	 +-------+  |  |                      | \      |      |
>>>>> 	 | HFPLL |----------+-----------------|  |-----| CPU0 |
>>>>> 	 +-------+  |  |    |                 |  |     |      |
>>>>> 		    |  |    | +-----+         | /      +------+
>>>>> 		    |  |    +-| / 2 |---------|/
>>>>> 		    |  |      +-----+         +
>>>>> 		    |  |         secondary
>>>>> 		    |  |            +
>>>>> 		    |  +------------|\
>>>>> 		    |               | |-+
>>>>> 		    +---------------|/  |   primary
>>>>> 				    +   |     +
>>>>> 					+-----|\       +------+
>>>>> 	 +-------+                            | \      |      |
>>>>> 	 | HFPLL |----------------------------|  |-----| CPU1 |
>>>>> 	 +-------+          |                 |  |     |      |
>>>>> 			    | +-----+         | /      +------+
>>>>> 			    +-| / 2 |---------|/
>>>>> 			      +-----+         +
>>>>>
>>>>> To support this in the common clock framework we model the muxes,
>>>>> dividers, and PLLs as different clocks. CPUfreq only interacts
>>>>> with the primary mux (farthest right in the diagram). When CPUfreq
>>>>> sets a rate, the mux code finds the best parent that can provide
>> the
>>> rate.
>>>>> Due to the design, QSB and the top PLL are always a fixed rate and
>>> thus
>>>>> only support one frequency each. These sources provide the lowest
>>>>> frequencies for the CPUs. The HFPLLs are where we can make the CPU
>>> go
>>>>> faster (GHz range). Sometimes we need to run the HFPLL twice as
>>>>> fast and divide it by two to get a particular frequency.
>>>>>
>>>>> When switching rates we can't leave the CPU clocked by the HFPLL
>>> because
>>>>> we need to turn off the output of the PLL when changing its
>>> frequency.
>>>>> This means we have to switch over to the secondary mux and use one
>>> of the
>>>>> fixed sources. This is why we need something like the safe parent
>>> patch.
>>>>>
>>>>> [1]
>>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/332607.html
>>>>> [2]
>>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/332615.html
>>>>> [3]
>>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/332608.html
>>>>> [4] https://lwn.net/Articles/740994/ 
>>>>> [5] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/12/19/537
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sricharan R (3):
>>>>>   clk: qcom: Add safe switch hook for krait mux clocks
>>>>>   cpufreq: qcom: Re-organise kryo cpufreq to use it for other nvmem
>>>>>     based qcom socs
>>>>>   cpufreq: qcom: Add support for krait based socs
>>>>>
>>>>> Stephen Boyd (11):
>>>>>   ARM: Add Krait L2 register accessor functions
>>>>>   clk: qcom: Add support for High-Frequency PLLs (HFPLLs)
>>>>>   clk: qcom: Add HFPLL driver
>>>>>   dt-bindings: clock: Document qcom,hfpll
>>>>>   clk: qcom: Add MSM8960/APQ8064's HFPLLs
>>>>>   clk: qcom: Add IPQ806X's HFPLLs
>>>>>   clk: qcom: Add support for Krait clocks
>>>>>   clk: qcom: Add KPSS ACC/GCC driver
>>>>>   dt-bindings: arm: Document qcom,kpss-gcc
>>>>>   clk: qcom: Add Krait clock controller driver
>>>>>   dt-bindings: clock: Document qcom,krait-cc
>>>>>
>>>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,kpss-acc.txt  |  19 +
>>>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,kpss-gcc.txt  |  44 +++
>>>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,hfpll.txt       |  60 ++++
>>>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,krait-cc.txt    |  34 ++
>>>>>  .../{kryo-cpufreq.txt => qcom-nvmem-cpufreq.txt}   |   7 +-
>>>>>  arch/arm/common/Kconfig                            |   3 +
>>>>>  arch/arm/common/Makefile                           |   1 +
>>>>>  arch/arm/common/krait-l2-accessors.c               |  48 +++
>>>>>  arch/arm/include/asm/krait-l2-accessors.h          |   9 +
>>>>>  drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig                           |  28 ++
>>>>>  drivers/clk/qcom/Makefile                          |   5 +
>>>>>  drivers/clk/qcom/clk-hfpll.c                       | 244
>>> +++++++++++++
>>>>>  drivers/clk/qcom/clk-hfpll.h                       |  44 +++
>>>>>  drivers/clk/qcom/clk-krait.c                       | 126 +++++++
>>>>>  drivers/clk/qcom/clk-krait.h                       |  40 +++
>>>>>  drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-ipq806x.c                     |  82 +++++
>>>>>  drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-msm8960.c                     | 172 +++++++++
>>>>>  drivers/clk/qcom/hfpll.c                           |  96 +++++
>>>>>  drivers/clk/qcom/kpss-xcc.c                        |  87 +++++
>>>>>  drivers/clk/qcom/krait-cc.c                        | 397
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>  drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm                        |   6 +-
>>>>>  drivers/cpufreq/Makefile                           |   2 +-
>>>>>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c               |   5 +
>>>>>  drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-kryo.c                | 232
>>> ------------
>>>>>  drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c               | 387
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>  include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-msm8960.h       |   2 +
>>>>>  26 files changed, 1941 insertions(+), 239 deletions(-)
>>>>>  create mode 100644
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,kpss-gcc.txt
>>>>>  create mode 100644
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,hfpll.txt
>>>>>  create mode 100644
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,krait-cc.txt
>>>>>  rename Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/{kryo-cpufreq.txt =>
>>> qcom-nvmem-cpufreq.txt} (98%)
>>>>>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/common/krait-l2-accessors.c
>>>>>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/krait-l2-accessors.h
>>>>>  create mode 100644 drivers/clk/qcom/clk-hfpll.c
>>>>>  create mode 100644 drivers/clk/qcom/clk-hfpll.h
>>>>>  create mode 100644 drivers/clk/qcom/clk-krait.c
>>>>>  create mode 100644 drivers/clk/qcom/clk-krait.h
>>>>>  create mode 100644 drivers/clk/qcom/hfpll.c
>>>>>  create mode 100644 drivers/clk/qcom/kpss-xcc.c
>>>>>  create mode 100644 drivers/clk/qcom/krait-cc.c
>>>>>  delete mode 100644 drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-kryo.c
>>>>>  create mode 100644 drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c
>>>>>
>>>>
> 

-- 
"QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ