linux-kernel - Re: Checkpatch bad Warning (Re: [PATCH] powerpc/kgdb: add kgdb_arch_set/remove

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <32b61fef-8da3-9203-1115-78e69afc56d4@c-s.fr>
Date:   Thu, 20 Sep 2018 14:07:41 +0000
From:   Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
To:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>, paul.burton@...s.com,
        ralf@...ux-mips.org, jhogan@...nel.org
Cc:     Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org
Subject: Re: Checkpatch bad Warning (Re: [PATCH] powerpc/kgdb: add
 kgdb_arch_set/remove_breakpoint())

Adding MIPS arch in the loop

On 09/20/2018 01:19 PM, Christophe LEROY wrote:
> 
> 
> Le 20/09/2018 à 15:13, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
>> Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> writes:
>>
>>> On Tue, 2018-09-18 at 09:33 +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>>>> On the below patch, checkpatch reports
>>>>
>>>> WARNING: struct kgdb_arch should normally be const
>>>> #127: FILE: arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c:480:
>>>> +struct kgdb_arch arch_kgdb_ops;
>>>>
>>>> But when I add 'const', I get compilation failure
>>>
>>> So don't add const.
>>>
>>> checkpatch is stupid.  You are not.
>>>
>>> _Always_ take checkpatch bleats with very
>>> large grains of salt.
>>>
>>> Perhaps send a patch to remove kgbd_arch
>>> from scripts/const_structs.checkpatch as
>>> it seems not ever to be const.
>>
>> I think it could/should be const though, it just requires updating all
>> arches.
>>
> 
> Yes I was thinking about doing it, but first thing is to change the way 
> MIPS initialises it:
> 
> 
> struct kgdb_arch arch_kgdb_ops;
> 
> int kgdb_arch_init(void)
> {
>      union mips_instruction insn = {
>          .r_format = {
>              .opcode = spec_op,
>              .func    = break_op,
>          }
>      };
>      memcpy(arch_kgdb_ops.gdb_bpt_instr, insn.byte, BREAK_INSTR_SIZE);
> 
> 
> Can this be done staticaly ?
> 
> Christophe