[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53f4c88b-14b7-c5b1-9690-1aad98cf56d4@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 14:30:14 +0000
From: Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>
To: "Michael Kelley (EOSG)" <Michael.H.Kelley@...rosoft.com>,
Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>
CC: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"rkrcmar@...hat.com" <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
vkuznets <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Jork Loeser <Jork.Loeser@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 4/13] KVM/MMU: Flush tlb directly in the
kvm_handle_hva_range()
On 9/20/2018 12:08 AM, Michael Kelley (EOSG) wrote:
> From: Tianyu Lan Sent: Monday, September 17, 2018 8:19 PM
>> +
>> + if (ret && kvm_available_flush_tlb_with_range()) {
>> + kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_with_address(kvm,
>> + gfn_start,
>> + gfn_end - gfn_start);
>
> Does the above need to be gfn_end - gfn_start + 1?
The flush range depends on the input parameter frame start and frame end
of for_each_slot_rmap_range().
for_each_slot_rmap_range(memslot, PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL,
PT_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL,
gfn_start, gfn_end - 1,
&iterator)
ret |= handler(kvm, iterator.rmap, memslot,
iterator.gfn, iterator.level, data);
The start is "gfn_start" and the end is "gfn_end - 1". The flush size is
(gfn_end - 1) - gfn_start + 1 = gfn_end - gfn_start.
>
>> + ret = 0;
>> + }
>
> Michael
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists