[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180920162338.21060-24-keescook@chromium.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 09:23:35 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
"Schaufler, Casey" <casey.schaufler@...el.com>,
LSM <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH security-next v2 23/26] LSM: Introduce enum lsm_order
In preparation for distinguishing the "capability" LSM from other LSMs,
it must be ordered first. This introduces LSM_ORDER_MUTABLE for the
general LSMs, LSM_ORDER_FIRST for capabilities, and LSM_ORDER_LAST for
anything that must run last (e.g. Landlock may use this in the future).
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
---
include/linux/lsm_hooks.h | 7 +++++++
security/security.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
index d75a42eb3ddd..bf29851baf47 100644
--- a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
+++ b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
@@ -2041,8 +2041,15 @@ extern void security_add_hooks(struct security_hook_list *hooks, int count,
#define LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR (1 << 0)
+enum lsm_order {
+ LSM_ORDER_FIRST = -1, /* This is only for capabilities. */
+ LSM_ORDER_MUTABLE = 0,
+ LSM_ORDER_LAST,
+};
+
struct lsm_info {
const char *name; /* Populated automatically. */
+ enum lsm_order order; /* Optional: default is LSM_ORDER_MUTABLE */
unsigned long flags; /* Optional: flags describing LSM */
int *enabled; /* Optional: NULL means enabled. */
int (*init)(void);
diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index 3fba28de789b..d649e7dea4c4 100644
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -62,6 +62,10 @@ static int lsm_enabled_true __initdata = 1;
static int lsm_enabled_false __initdata = 0;
static void __init set_enabled(struct lsm_info *lsm, bool enabled)
{
+ /* First LSM cannot have enablement changed. */
+ if (lsm->order == LSM_ORDER_FIRST)
+ return;
+
if (!lsm->enabled) {
/*
* If the LSM hasn't configured an enable flag, we
@@ -124,7 +128,8 @@ static void __init parse_lsm_order(const char *order, const char *origin)
bool found = false;
for (lsm = __start_lsm_info; lsm < __end_lsm_info; lsm++) {
- if ((lsm->flags & LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR) == 0 &&
+ if (lsm->order == LSM_ORDER_MUTABLE &&
+ (lsm->flags & LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR) == 0 &&
strcmp(lsm->name, name) == 0) {
append_ordered_lsm(lsm, origin);
found = true;
@@ -142,6 +147,12 @@ static void __init prepare_lsm_order(void)
{
struct lsm_info *lsm;
+ /* LSM_ORDER_FIRST is always first. */
+ for (lsm = __start_lsm_info; lsm < __end_lsm_info; lsm++) {
+ if (lsm->order == LSM_ORDER_FIRST)
+ append_ordered_lsm(lsm, "first");
+ }
+
/* Parse order from commandline, if present. */
if (chosen_lsm_order)
parse_lsm_order(chosen_lsm_order, "cmdline");
@@ -151,9 +162,16 @@ static void __init prepare_lsm_order(void)
/* Add any missing LSMs, in link order. */
for (lsm = __start_lsm_info; lsm < __end_lsm_info; lsm++) {
- if ((lsm->flags & LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR) == 0)
+ if (lsm->order == LSM_ORDER_MUTABLE &&
+ (lsm->flags & LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR) == 0)
append_ordered_lsm(lsm, "link-time");
}
+
+ /* LSM_ORDER_LAST is always last. */
+ for (lsm = __start_lsm_info; lsm < __end_lsm_info; lsm++) {
+ if (lsm->order == LSM_ORDER_LAST)
+ append_ordered_lsm(lsm, "last");
+ }
}
/* Is an LSM allowed to be enabled? */
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists