[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jJRQzWF=C_kmOpZ8XcUzAhkoZnNi7a7KzEHJtFhMNd+3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 10:44:36 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
Cc: LSM <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
SE Linux <selinux@...ho.nsa.gov>,
LKLM <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>,
Salvatore Mesoraca <s.mesoraca16@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 15/16] LSM: Infrastructure management of the ipc
security blob
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 5:21 PM, Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com> wrote:
> LSM: Infrastructure management of the ipc security blob
>
> Move management of the kern_ipc_perm->security and
> msg_msg->security blobs out of the individual security
> modules and into the security infrastructure. Instead
> of allocating the blobs from within the modules the modules
> tell the infrastructure how much space is required, and
> the space is allocated there.
Maybe split this up too? (SELinux and Smack need tweaks?)
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists