[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACPK8XeEZeMskkxNChhNSO+brpoPJ5FqweWNXe22BpyytwCwFw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 13:02:56 +0930
From: Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>
To: Tao Ren <taoren@...com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
OpenBMC Maillist <openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org>, cov@...com,
Tian Fang <tfang@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clocksource/drivers/fttmr010: fix set_next_event handler
On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 at 06:39, Tao Ren <taoren@...com> wrote:
>
> On 9/20/18, 8:46 AM, "Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> > Actually this is much more intuitive too, it is the typical way to handle
> > a down-counting timer. Good catch!
> > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
>
> Thank you Linus for the quick review!
>
> > Sorry for any cargo-cult programming on my part :/
> > Would be nice to get a nod from the AST2400 users that this works
> > for them too, so included them in the To: field.
>
> Make sense. I actually booted up kernel on qemu-palmetto (ast2400) but I'm doubting if test is valid because it depends on how qemu emulates the hardware. It would be great if someone can help to verify the patch on physical ast2400.
I gave this a spin on the ast2400. It looked okay, but I was wondering
if you could share you test case so I can run the same test?
Cheers,
Joel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists