linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH security-next v2 19/26] LSM: Introduce CONFIG_LSM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <17226f0a-e320-dab0-8691-aa0a22f07544@schaufler-ca.com>
Date:   Thu, 20 Sep 2018 17:14:35 -0700
From:   Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Cc:     John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
        Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
        Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
        "Schaufler, Casey" <casey.schaufler@...el.com>,
        LSM <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH security-next v2 19/26] LSM: Introduce CONFIG_LSM_ORDER

On 9/20/2018 5:10 PM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> On 9/20/2018 9:23 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
>> This provides a way to declare LSM initialization order via Kconfig.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>> ---
>>  security/Kconfig    | 11 +++++++++++
>>  security/security.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>  2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/security/Kconfig b/security/Kconfig
>> index 27d8b2688f75..de8202886c1d 100644
>> --- a/security/Kconfig
>> +++ b/security/Kconfig
>> @@ -276,5 +276,16 @@ config DEFAULT_SECURITY
>>  	default "apparmor" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_APPARMOR
>>  	default "" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_DAC
>>  
>> +config LSM_ORDER
>> +	string "Default initialization order of builtin LSMs"
>> +	default "integrity"
> I would like to see the default spelled out rather than
> provided implicitly.
>
>   +	  default "integrity,yama,loadpin,selinux,smack,apparmor,tomoyo"

I see now that comes later in the patch set. Never mind.