linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/22] Unify MediaTek pinctrl in preparation for MT8183 and MT6765

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 21 Sep 2018 12:22:41 +0800
From:   Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>
To:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
CC:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/22] Unify MediaTek pinctrl in preparation for
 MT8183 and MT6765

On Tue, 2018-09-18 at 21:37 -0700, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 10:54:10AM +0800, Sean Wang wrote:
> > On Tue, 2018-09-18 at 15:07 -0700, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > > On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 4:07 AM <sean.wang@...iatek.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > v2 and changes since v1:
> > > 
> > > I had trouble applying the last patches in the series so I applied
> > > all on an immutable branch (ib-mtk) then merged that into devel
> > > and added a patch on top to fix up some GPIO includes (just sent).
> > > 
> > > Please check the result!
> > > 
> > 
> > Sure, I'll take a look and and test on the devel branch.
> > 
> > On the top, I'll add a fix for the issue recently reported by kbuild
> > test robot about implicit declaration and a new MT6765 driver based
> > on the series.
> >
> 
> Hi Sean,
> 
> Do you have any plans to add support for MT6797?
> 

I personally have no the plan to add support to MT6797 because I have no
the device, but as I knew some of people in mediatek have interest to
add them by volunteers and thus there is no clear schedule. Eventually,
if they're really done, they would be still based on vendor binding not
by generic binding.

> Thanks,
> Mani
> 
> > > Yours,
> > > Linus Walleij
> > 
> >