[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7eb41388-993b-34c3-ae3e-c10607af904a@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 07:13:54 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: peng.hao2@....com.cn, sean.j.christopherson@...el.com
Cc: wang.yi59@....com.cn, rkrcmar@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
zhong.weidong@....com.cn, xu.xi8@....com.cn, jiang.biao2@....com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: fix failure of injecting exceptions
inx86_emulate_instruction
On 21/09/2018 04:08, peng.hao2@....com.cn wrote:
>>> Unqueued, sorry. The hypercall test from kvm-unit-tests fails. A
>>> VMCALL on the "edge" of canonical address space, i.e. at 0x7ffffffffffd,
>>> raises a general protection fault before this patch and a double fault
>>> afterwards.
>> Peng Hao submitted a very similar patch[1], the difference being that
>> it also modified x86_emulate_instruction() to ignore the result of
>> inject_emulated_exception(). I have no idea if that change is correct
>> but it may be related to the aforementioned unit test failing.
> The return value of inject_emulated_exception for #PF represents whether in nested vcpu,
> not about the success or failure. Because we are not in nested vcpu, inject_emulated_exception
> must return false. And for other exceptions, inject_emulated_exception just return false.
> After propagating exceptions to guest, we just should return to guest mode and let guest handle.
Yes, your patch should work, and the x86_emulate_instruction code that
is there now is clearly wrong (though I'm not sure how the double-fault
comes up, #GP + #UD shouldn't generate one because #UD is a benign
exception).
Peng Hao, do you have a testcase? Eduardo's kvm-unit-tests patch from
Nov 2017 doesn't reproduce the bug anymore for me.
Thanks,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists