linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: intel: Do pin translation in other GPIO operations as well

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180921075636.GD2664@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 21 Sep 2018 10:56:36 +0300
From:   Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        rajatja@...gle.com, casey.g.bowman@...el.com,
        matthew.s.atwood@...el.com,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: intel: Do pin translation in other GPIO
 operations as well

On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 08:26:25AM -0700, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 8:36 AM Mika Westerberg
> <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > For some reason I thought GPIOLIB handles translation from GPIO ranges
> > to pinctrl pins but it turns out not to be the case. This means that
> > when GPIOs operations are performed for a pin controller having a custom
> > GPIO base such as Cannon Lake and Ice Lake incorrect pin number gets
> > used internally.
> >
> > Fix this in the same way we did for lock/unlock IRQ operations and
> > translate the GPIO number to pin before using it.
> >
> > Fixes: a60eac3239f0 ("pinctrl: intel: Allow custom GPIO base for pad groups")
> > Reported-by: Rajat Jain <rajatja@...gle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> I applied this for fixes.
> 
> However when merging with devel I get some a merge conflict,
> probably due to some cleanups from Andy.
> 
> I tried to fix it up (just use your code) but please check the
> result.

Looks good to me. Thanks!