[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180921182016.45039844@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 18:20:16 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Subject: Re: [REVIEW][PATCH 1/9] signal/powerpc: Use force_sig_mceerr as
appropriate
Hi Eric,
On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 19:58:42 +0200 "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
>
> In do_sigbus isolate the mceerr signaling code and call
> force_sig_mceerr instead of falling through to the force_sig_info that
> works for all of the other signals.
>
> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Looks good to me. I was going to mention further cleanup, but I see
you do that in a later patch.
Reviewed-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists