linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm: sun4i: Fix a uninitialized variable warning.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5BA504E4.90607@huawei.com>
Date:   Fri, 21 Sep 2018 22:49:08 +0800
From:   zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
To:     Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>
CC:     <airlied@...ux.ie>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: sun4i: Fix a uninitialized variable warning.

On 2018/9/21 22:26, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 05:01:32PM +0800, zhong jiang wrote:
>> On 2018/9/19 16:47, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 03:25:20PM +0800, zhong jiang wrote:
>>>> Fix the following compile warning:
>>>>
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c:1088: warning: 'has_lvds_alt' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
>>>> bool has_lvds_rst, has_lvds_alt, can_lvds;
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
>>> I can't see any code path that would lead to an uninitialized usage of
>>> that variable.
>>>
>>> Which compiler produced that warning? I tried building it today with
>>> gcc 8.1.1, and I don't see that warning either.
>> I indeed  hit the issue.  the gcc version is
>> gcc (Ubuntu 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.9) 5.4.0 20160609
> I've tested with 4.* gcc, and it didn't report any error. It seems to
> be a false positive for this particular version, so there's no need to
> merge that patch. If more people are affected, we'll obviously do
> something about it though.
Yep,  it rarely occur.  I just happen once.  Thank you for reply.

Sincerely,
zhong jiang
> Thanks!
> Maxime
>