[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <17547.1537542706@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 16:11:46 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] fsconfig: rename FSCONFIG_CMD_CREATE to FSCONFIG_CMD_OBTAIN
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com> wrote:
> The old name strongly implies that a new superblock will be created from
> the fs_context. This is not true: filesystems are free to retuse an
> existing superblock and return that (for good reason).
Kind of like open(O_CREAT) only ever creates files, right;-)
Actually, FSCONFIG_CMD_OPEN might be a better name.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists