lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 21 Sep 2018 20:27:09 -0400
From:   Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>
To:     Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/22] various dynamic_debug patches

On 09/19/2018 06:04 PM, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> This started as an experiment to see how hard it would be to change
> the four pointers in struct _ddebug into relative offsets, a la
> CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG_RELATIVE_POINTERS, thus saving 16 bytes per
> pr_debug site (and thus exactly making up for the extra space used by
> the introduction of jump labels in 9049fc74). I stumbled on a few
> things that are probably worth fixing regardless of whether the latter
> half of this series is deemed worthwhile.
> 
> Patch relationships: 1-2, 3-4, 5-6 and 15-16 can be applied
> individually, though 2, 4 and 6 probably makes most sense in the
> context of the final goal of the series.
> 
> 7-12 I believe make sense on their own. Patch 13 again only makes
> sense if we go all the way, and 14 and 17 depend on 13.
> 
> 18-21 are more preparatory patches, and finally 22 switch over x86-64
> to use CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG_RELATIVE_POINTERS. I've tested that the
> end result boots under virtme and that the dynamic_debug control file
> has the expected contents.
> 

I would like to to see all these patches included. Feel free to add:
Acked-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>

I've been wanting to add DYNAMIC_DEBUG_BRANCH to the
[dev,net,pr].*ratelimited functions. That should reduce the size of the
text as well.

Thanks,

-Jason

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ