[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1809221219270.1391@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2018 12:20:48 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
"Schaufler, Casey" <casey.schaufler@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
"Woodhouse, David" <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] Harden spectrev2 userspace-userspace protection
On Sat, 22 Sep 2018, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 11:53:14AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > +bool ptrace_may_access_sched(struct task_struct *task, unsigned int mode)
> > +{
> > + struct mm_struct *mm;
> > + int res;
> > +
> > + res = __ptrace_may_access_basic(task, mode);
> > + if (res <= 0)
> > + return !res;
> > +
> > + rcu_read_lock();
> > + res = __ptrace_may_access_cred(__task_cred(task), mode);
> > rcu_read_unlock();
> > + if (res)
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + mm = task->mm;
> > + if (mm && get_dumpable(mm) != SUID_DUMP_USER)
> > + return false;
> > + return true;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* Returns 0 on success, -errno on denial. */
> > +static int __ptrace_may_access(struct task_struct *task, unsigned int mode)
> > +{
> > + const struct cred *tcred;
> > + struct mm_struct *mm;
> > + int res;
> > +
> > + res = __ptrace_may_access_basic(task, mode);
> > + if (res <= 0)
> > + return res;
> > +
> > + rcu_read_lock();
> > + tcred = __task_cred(task);
> > + res = __ptrace_may_access_cred(tcred, mode);
> > + if (res > 0)
> > + res = ptrace_has_cap(tcred->user_ns, mode) ? 0 : -EPERM;
> > rcu_read_unlock();
> > + if (res < 0)
> > + return res;
> > +
> > mm = task->mm;
> > + if (mm && (get_dumpable(mm) != SUID_DUMP_USER &&
> > + !ptrace_has_cap(mm->user_ns, mode)))
> > + return -EPERM;
> >
> > return security_ptrace_access_check(task, mode);
> > }
>
> This has some unfortunate duplication.
>
> Lets go with it for now, but I'll see if I can do something about that
> later.
Yes, I know. I tried to make the duplication smaller, but all attempts
ended up being a convoluted mess. I'll try again after applying more
coffee.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists