[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180922114849.GA3890@himanshu-Vostro-3559>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2018 17:18:49 +0530
From: Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@...il.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@...rochip.com>,
ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio: adc: at91: fix wrong channel number in
triggered buffer mode
On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 11:36:16AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 15:26:03 +0800
> kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Eugen,
> This one is leaving me stumped...
>
> Anyone care to point out what I'm missing that is wrong here?
>
> Also Eugen, please don't cc stable on a patch directly. It is fine to send
> a backport request once a patch has hit mainline, but before that it's just
> adding noise to a list as they won't take it directly anyway.
Song is correct on this one.
So, just replace the declaration to:
struct iio_chan_spec const *chan;
and then warning goes away...
Another thing, its better not to reply the automated bot and instead to
the author by changing "From" address. :)
That is what I do often when replying to that thread.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180921182616.GA2077@himanshu-Vostro-3559/
And it nests properly in the given thread avoiding any noise to kbuild
bot.
--
Himanshu Jha
Undergraduate Student
Department of Electronics & Communication
Guru Tegh Bahadur Institute of Technology
Powered by blists - more mailing lists