[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19867.1537574620@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2018 01:03:40 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend] uapi/linux/keyctl.h: don't use C++ reserved keyword as a struct member name
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> Are there such programs? Do they reference the `private' field?
They would use the keyutils.h header from keyutils package probably. There
the field was named "priv" not "private". The kernel's UAPI header should be
amended again to match that.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists