[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ2a_DfCmbFmpTngFnXzYy07gvEzN5UhAhrE8Cd8PowevrLUNw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2018 17:31:16 +0200
From: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@...glemail.com>
To: fw@...len.de
Cc: pablo@...filter.org, kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu, davem@...emloft.net,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>, jmorris@...ei.org,
serge@...lyn.com, selinux <selinux@...ho.nsa.gov>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] netfilter: nf_tables: add SECMARK support
> > +struct nft_secmark {
> > + char ctx[NFT_SECMARK_CTX_MAXLEN];
> > + int len;
> > + u32 secid;
> > +};
>
> Can you change this to:
>
> struct nft_secmark {
> u32 secid;
> char *ctx;
> };
Does the nla_policy struct needs an update too? (regarding then .len member)
+static const struct nla_policy nft_secmark_policy[NFTA_SECMARK_MAX + 1] = {
+ [NFTA_SECMARK_CTX] = { .type = NLA_STRING, .len =
NFT_SECMARK_CTX_MAXLEN },
+}
NFT_SECMARK_CTX_MAXLEN might be dropped then..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists