| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <8c19c840-292c-a5c4-f3d3-0c6fb14b15fb@codeaurora.org>
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2018 15:10:55 +0530
From: Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>
To: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
Amit Nischal <anischal@...eaurora.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, robh@...nel.org,
skannan@...eaurora.org, amit.kucheria@...aro.org,
evgreen@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Add support for QCOM cpufreq HW
driver
Hello Matthias,
Thanks for your review comments.
On 8/29/2018 11:31 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> Hi Taniya,
>
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 04:12:50PM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
>> The CPUfreq HW present in some QCOM chipsets offloads the steps necessary
>> for changing the frequency of CPUs. The driver implements the cpufreq
>> driver interface for this hardware engine.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 11 ++
>> drivers/cpufreq/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c | 348 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 360 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
>> index 0cd8eb7..93a9d72 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
>> @@ -298,3 +298,14 @@ config ARM_PXA2xx_CPUFREQ
>> This add the CPUFreq driver support for Intel PXA2xx SOCs.
>>
>> If in doubt, say N.
>> +
>> +config ARM_QCOM_CPUFREQ_HW
>> + bool "QCOM CPUFreq HW driver"
>> + depends on ARCH_QCOM
>> + help
>> + Support for the CPUFreq HW driver.
>> + Some QCOM chipsets have a HW engine to offload the steps
>> + necessary for changing the frequency of the CPUs. Firmware loaded
>> + in this engine exposes a programming interface to the OS.
>> + The driver implements the cpufreq interface for this HW engine.
>> + Say Y if you want to support CPUFreq HW.
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
>> index c1ffeab..ca48a1d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
>> @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_TEGRA124_CPUFREQ) += tegra124-cpufreq.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_TEGRA186_CPUFREQ) += tegra186-cpufreq.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_TI_CPUFREQ) += ti-cpufreq.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_VEXPRESS_SPC_CPUFREQ) += vexpress-spc-cpufreq.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_QCOM_CPUFREQ_HW) += qcom-cpufreq-hw.o
>>
>>
>> ##################################################################################
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..ea8f7d1
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,348 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (c) 2018, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/cpufreq.h>
>> +#include <linux/init.h>
>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
>> +
>> +#define INIT_RATE 300000000UL
>> +#define LUT_MAX_ENTRIES 40U
>> +#define CORE_COUNT_VAL(val) (((val) & (GENMASK(18, 16))) >> 16)
>> +#define LUT_ROW_SIZE 32
>> +
>> +enum {
>> + REG_ENABLE,
>> + REG_LUT_TABLE,
>> + REG_PERF_STATE,
>> +
>> + REG_ARRAY_SIZE,
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct cpufreq_qcom {
>> + struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table;
>> + struct device *dev;
>
> 'dev' is not used and can be removed.
>
Thanks, would remove in the next patch.
>> ...
>>
>> +static int qcom_cpu_resources_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
>> + struct device_node *np, unsigned int cpu,
>> + unsigned long xo_rate)
>> +{
>> + struct cpufreq_qcom *c;
>> + struct resource res;
>> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> + const u16 *offsets;
>> + int ret, i, cpu_first, cpu_r;
>> + void __iomem *base;
>> +
>> + if (qcom_freq_domain_map[cpu])
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + c = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*c), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!c)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + offsets = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
>> + if (!offsets)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + if (of_address_to_resource(np, 0, &res))
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, &res);
>> + if (!base)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + for (i = REG_ENABLE; i < REG_ARRAY_SIZE; i++)
>> + c->reg_bases[i] = base + offsets[i];
>> +
>> + /* HW should be in enabled state to proceed */
>> + if (!(readl_relaxed(c->reg_bases[REG_ENABLE]) & 0x1)) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "%s cpufreq hardware not enabled\n", np->name);
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = qcom_get_related_cpus(np, &c->related_cpus);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "%s failed to get related CPUs\n", np->name);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + c->max_cores = cpumask_weight(&c->related_cpus);
>> + if (!c->max_cores)
>> + return -ENOENT;
>> +
>> + c->xo_rate = xo_rate;
>> +
>> + ret = qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(pdev, c);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "%s failed to read LUT\n", np->name);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + qcom_freq_domain_map[cpu] = c;
>> +
>> + /* Related CPUs */
>> + cpu_first = cpumask_first(&c->related_cpus);
>> +
>> + for_each_cpu(cpu_r, &c->related_cpus) {
>> + if (cpu_r != cpu_first)
>> + qcom_freq_domain_map[cpu_r] =
>> + qcom_freq_domain_map[cpu_first];
>> + }
>
> The above ten lines could be simplified to:
>
> for_each_cpu(cpu_r, &c->related_cpus)
> qcom_freq_domain_map[cpu_r] = c;
>
Would clean it up in the next patch.
>> ...
>>
>> +static int __init qcom_cpufreq_hw_init(void)
>> +{
>> + return platform_driver_register(&qcom_cpufreq_hw_driver);
>> +}
>> +subsys_initcall(qcom_cpufreq_hw_init);
>
> Is subsys_initcall used for a particular reason? It will cause
> problems when registering cooling devices, since the thermal device
> class is initialized through an fs_initcall, which are executed
> later.
>
> Most cpufreq drivers use module_init, device_initcall or
> late_initcall, can't this driver use one of those?
>
We want the CPU to be scaling to the highest frequency at the earliest.
> Cheers
>
> Matthias
>
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists