[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180924001025.GA7496@Asurada>
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2018 17:10:25 -0700
From: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: jdelvare@...e.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
corbet@....net, afd@...com, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: hwmon: Add ina3221 documentation
On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 11:36:22PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>>>>+ Optional properties:
> >>>>>+ - input-label: Name of the input source
>
> Just noticed the "input-" here. Please just use "label".
Will fix in v5.
> >>>>>+ input1 {
> >>>>>+ input-id = <0x1>;
> >>>>
> >>>>We'll have to find a better name for this. Feel free to look up examples in the
> >>>>existing devicetree descriptions. The one that seems to be used most of the time
> >>>>to indicate a channel index or id is "reg". It should also start with 0 - there
> >>>>is no real reason for it to start with 1; it only makes the code more complex.
> >>>
> >>>The reason is that the port start from 1 in the datasheet.
> >>>
> >>
> >>Maybe, but for me I'll want to have something that we can reuse for other chips.
> >>Having the index start with 0 for one chip and with 1 for another would be
> >>confusing. It is bad enough that we have in[0..n] for voltages and temp[1..n]
> >>for temperatures. I would not want to see the same in devicetree files,
> >>and much less so on a per-device basis. It is also pretty common to start
> >>channel numbers with 0 in devicetree files.
> >
> >Understood. I search a bit and saw most of "*-id" start from 0,
> >although I cannot be sure whether their Datasheet/RM/schematics
> >are counting from 0 or 1.
> >
> >And I also found a transposing example:
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/mrvl,pxa-ssp.txt
> >
>
> You'll always find an example for anything in the kernel. In this case,
> it is for one specific chip. I'll want this to be reusable as template for
> _all_ hardware monitoring chips.
I see.
Thanks
Nicolin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists