[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0E2DD374-B1DA-47D9-B327-D5BBC39F7FBB@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 15:33:56 +0100
From: Craig <ctatlor97@...il.com>
To: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
CC: Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: qcom: Add Global Clock controller (GCC) driver for SDM660
On 24 September 2018 13:44:33 BST, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de> wrote:
>Hi Craig,
>
>Am Montag, 13. August 2018, 09:45:09 CEST schrieb Craig Tatlor:
>> On 13 August 2018 07:55:34 BST, Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>
>wrote:
>> >Hello Craig,
>> >
>> >Could you please correct the authorship and also provide the
>reference
>> >to code where this is picked from?
>> Okay,
>> Got code from here
>https://github.com/sonyxperiadev/kernel/blob/aosp/LA.UM.6.4.r1/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sdm660.c
>> but changed it quite a bit for upstream,
>> Should I change the commit author and add your signed off by and say
>I did cleanups on my signed off by.
>
>yep, for something this huge it is really the correct way to keep the
>original authorship intact as Taniya did the initial big work, and just
>add you change-description, so something like
>
>---- 8< ------
>Add support for the global clock controller found on SDM660
>based devices. This should allow most non-multimedia device
>drivers to probe and control their clocks.
>Based on CAF implementation.
>
>Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>
>[ description of changes ... often seen in these brackets ]
>Signed-off-by: Craig Tatlor <ctatlor97@...il.com>
>---- 8< ------
>
Sure, will do, though I'm sure qcom have a program to generate the drivers :)
>Also, do you plan to continue working on this, as I would be
>interessted
>in the clock driver for a sdm660-based phone as well
Yup, was really just waiting for reply to this question,
>
>
>Thanks
>Heiko
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists