[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJfpegt60Bcmu+fHRTL-HE-Uw5rvP3Nb_yuzfpX02E9Z8ECbdg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 17:04:13 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
Cc: kuznet@...tuozzo.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] fuse: Solve request_find() bottleneck
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 2:08 PM, Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com> wrote:
> 2 weeks passed, so ping.
>
> Miklos, any reaction on this?
>
> Thanks,
> Kirill
>
> On 11.09.2018 13:11, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We noticed the performance bottle neck in FUSE running our
>> Virtuozzo storage over rdma. On some types of workload
>> we observe 20% of time spent in request_find() in profiler.
>> This function is iterating over long list of requests, and it
>> scales bad.
>>
>> The patch introduces hash table to reduce the number
>> of iterations, we do in this function. Also, algorithm
>> of generating IDs for interrupt requests is changed,
>> simplified request_find() function and killed
>> fuse_req::intr_unique field.
Concept looks good. Will review details...
Thanks,
Miklos
Powered by blists - more mailing lists