[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180924155616.GA7060@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 17:56:16 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
Steve Muckle <smuckle@...gle.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 14/16] sched/core: uclamp: request CAP_SYS_ADMIN by
default
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 04:14:00PM +0100, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> On 21-Sep 11:13, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Laptops with active cooling however...
>
> How do you see active cooling playing a role ?
>
> Are you thinking, for example, at reduced fan noise if we remain below
> a certain OPP ?
>
> Are you factoring fans power consumptions into the overall P consumption ?
Nothing as fancy as that; I just figured that with a larger cooling
capacity, you can push chips higher onto that curve past the optimal
IPC/Watt point. Make it go fast etc..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists