[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <10c706fd-2252-f11b-312e-ae0d97d9a538@virtuozzo.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 19:07:18 +0300
From: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>,
linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:XFS FILESYSTEM" <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: block: DMA alignment of IO buffer allocated from slab
On 09/24/2018 06:58 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-09-24 at 18:52 +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
>> Yes, with CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB=y, CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON=y kmalloc() guarantees
>> that result is aligned on ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN boundary.
>
> Had you noticed that Vitaly Kuznetsov showed that this is not the case? See
> also https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/87h8ij0zot.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com/.
>
I'm not following. On x86-64 ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN is 8, all pointers that Vitaly Kuznetsov showed are 8-byte aligned.
> Thanks,
>
> Bart.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists