lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180924171443.GI18685@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date:   Mon, 24 Sep 2018 19:14:43 +0200
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:     Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@...cle.com>
Cc:     "prakash.sangappa" <prakash.sangappa@...cle.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        dave.hansen@...el.com, nao.horiguchi@...il.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
        khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/6] VA to numa node information

On Fri 14-09-18 12:01:18, Steven Sistare wrote:
> On 9/14/2018 1:56 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> > Why does this matter for something that is for analysis purposes.
> > Reading the file for the whole address space is far from a free
> > operation. Is the page walk optimization really essential for usability?
> > Moreover what prevents move_pages implementation to be clever for the
> > page walk itself? In other words why would we want to add a new API
> > rather than make the existing one faster for everybody.
> 
> One could optimize move pages.  If the caller passes a consecutive range
> of small pages, and the page walk sees that a VA is mapped by a huge page, 
> then it can return the same numa node for each of the following VA's that fall 
> into the huge page range. It would be faster than 55 nsec per small page, but 
> hard to say how much faster, and the cost is still driven by the number of 
> small pages. 

This is exactly what I was arguing for. There is some room for
improvements for the existing interface. I yet have to hear the explicit
usecase which would required even better performance that cannot be
achieved by the existing API.

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ