linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] wimax/i2400m: fix spelling mistake "unitialized" -> "uninitialized"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8889cb0c-9f21-0e4f-7938-658c87aad37e@canonical.com>
Date:   Mon, 24 Sep 2018 18:35:29 +0100
From:   Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To:     Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
        Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky.perez-gonzalez@...el.com>,
        linux-wimax@...el.com, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wimax/i2400m: fix spelling mistake "unitialized" ->
 "uninitialized"

On 24/09/18 18:27, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> On 09/24/2018 08:18 PM, Colin King wrote:
> 
>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>>
>> Trivial fix to spelling mistake in ms_to_errno array of error messages
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/control.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/control.c b/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/control.c
>> index 094cea775d0c..0475ad553707 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/control.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/control.c
>> @@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ static const struct
>>  	[I2400M_MS_ACCESSIBILITY_ERROR] = { "accesibility error", -EIO },
>>  	[I2400M_MS_BUSY] = { "busy", -EBUSY },
>>  	[I2400M_MS_CORRUPTED_TLV] = { "corrupted TLV", -EILSEQ },
>> -	[I2400M_MS_UNINITIALIZED] = { "not unitialized", -EILSEQ },
>> +	[I2400M_MS_UNINITIALIZED] = { "not uninitialized", -EILSEQ },
> 
>    I suspect they rather meant "not initialized".

Of course, that makes far more sense. I send a V2.

> 
> [...]
> 
> MBR, Sergei
>