lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180924212541.22c7eec2@archlinux>
Date:   Mon, 24 Sep 2018 21:25:41 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@...rochip.com>
Cc:     <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] iio: adc: at91: fix wrong channel number in
 triggered buffer mode

On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 10:51:44 +0300
Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@...rochip.com> wrote:

> When channels are registered, the hardware channel number is not the
> actual iio channel number.
> This is because the driver is probed with a certain number of accessible
> channels. Some pins are routed and some not, depending on the description of
> the board in the DT.
> Because of that, channels 0,1,2,3 can correspond to hardware channels
> 2,3,4,5 for example.
> In the buffered triggered case, we need to do the translation accordingly.
> Fixed the channel number to stop reading the wrong channel.
> 
> Fixes 0e589d5fb "ARM: AT91: IIO: Add AT91 ADC driver."
> Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@...rochip.com>
Again.  Looks entirely sensible to me, but I'd like to leave it
a little longer for Maxime to have an opportunity to comment.
(or anyone else for that matter!)

Do give me a poke if I seem to have forgotten this in a week or so
though.

Thanks,

Jonathan

> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Added 'const' spec to the declaration to avoid build warning
> 
>  drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
> index e3be88e..75d2f73 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
> @@ -248,12 +248,14 @@ static irqreturn_t at91_adc_trigger_handler(int irq, void *p)
>  	struct iio_poll_func *pf = p;
>  	struct iio_dev *idev = pf->indio_dev;
>  	struct at91_adc_state *st = iio_priv(idev);
> +	struct iio_chan_spec const *chan;
>  	int i, j = 0;
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < idev->masklength; i++) {
>  		if (!test_bit(i, idev->active_scan_mask))
>  			continue;
> -		st->buffer[j] = at91_adc_readl(st, AT91_ADC_CHAN(st, i));
> +		chan = idev->channels + i;
> +		st->buffer[j] = at91_adc_readl(st, AT91_ADC_CHAN(st, chan->channel));
>  		j++;
>  	}
>  

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ