[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180924235452.GI2523@minitux>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 16:54:52 -0700
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
Cc: jacek.anaszewski@...il.com, pavel@....cz, rteysseyre@...il.com,
broonie@...nel.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 1/2] leds: core: Introduce LED pattern trigger
On Mon 10 Sep 19:47 PDT 2018, Baolin Wang wrote:
[..]
> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-led-trigger-pattern b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-led-trigger-pattern
[..]
> +What: /sys/class/leds/<led>/hw_pattern
> +Date: September 2018
> +KernelVersion: 4.20
> +Description:
> + Specify a hardware pattern for the LED, for LED hardware that
> + supports autonomously controlling brightness over time, according
> + to some preprogrammed hardware patterns.
> +
> + Since different LED hardware can have different semantics of
> + hardware patterns, each driver is expected to provide its own
> + description for the hardware patterns in their ABI documentation
> + file.
> +
> +What: /sys/class/leds/<led>/repeat
> +Date: September 2018
> +KernelVersion: 4.20
> +Description:
> + Specify a pattern repeat number. -1 means repeat indefinitely,
> + other negative numbers and number 0 are invalid.
> +
> + This file will always return the originally written repeat
> + number.
This captures the infinite case much better, thanks!
Given that 0 is described as invalid, does this imply that setting a new
pattern the repeat will be disabled? And hence if my hardware supports
only infinite or no-repeat setting a new pattern is the way to disable
further repeats (rather than just setting repeat = 0)?
Regardless, I believe the semantics of these two files will work fine
for my Qualcomm LPG driver.
Regards,
Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists