[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180924135308.3fc89eeb.cohuck@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 13:53:08 +0200
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Cc: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, freude@...ibm.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, kwankhede@...dia.com,
bjsdjshi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
alex.williamson@...hat.com, pmorel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
alifm@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, mjrosato@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
jjherne@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, thuth@...hat.com,
pasic@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, berrange@...hat.com,
fiuczy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, buendgen@...ibm.com,
frankja@...ux.ibm.com, Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/26] guest dedicated crypto adapters
On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 12:10:37 +0200
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com> wrote:
> FWIW, assuming that review comments for v10 will be addresses in v11, I plan to
> add the upcoming v11 to a topic branch and will merge that after 2 or 3 days after
> v11 in kvms390/next.
As said before, I think this looks sane enough to merge with the
requested changes.
> In the future the vfio-ap driver will likely be handled by
> Martins s390 tree, so I guess it makes sense for him to merge the upcoming
> topic branch as well. I will coordinate with Martin.
I assume future patches will still be posted to kvm + linux-s390 for
review?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists