lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <de042465-e9b9-3782-00ce-38943053c7b6@talpey.com>
Date:   Sun, 23 Sep 2018 21:00:03 -0700
From:   Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>
To:     Stefan Metzmacher <metze@...ba.org>,
        Long Li <longli@...hange.microsoft.com>,
        Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
        samba-technical@...ts.samba.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Tom Talpey <ttalpey@...rosoft.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v7 21/22] CIFS: SMBD: Upper layer performs SMB read via
 RDMA write through memory registration

On 9/23/2018 2:24 PM, Stefan Metzmacher wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> 
>>> I just tested that setting:
>>>
>>> mr->iova &= (PAGE_SIZE - 1);
>>> mr->iova |= 0xFFFFFFFF00000000;
>>>
>>> after the ib_map_mr_sg() and before doing the IB_WR_REG_MR, seems to
>>> work.
>>
>> Good! As you know, we were concerned about it after seeing that
>> the ib_dma_map_sg() code was unconditionally setting it to the
>> dma_mapped address. By salting those FFFF's with varying data,
>> this should give your FRWR regions stronger integrity in addition
>> to not leaking kernel "addresses" to the wire.
> 
> Just wondering... Isn't the thing we use called FRMR?

They're basically the same concept, it's a subtle difference.

FRMR = Fast Register Memory Region
FRWR = Fast Register Work Request

The memory region is the mr itself, this is created early on.

The work request is built when actually binding the physical
pages to the region, and setting the offset, length, etc, which
is what's happening in the routine that I made the comment on.

So, for this discussion I chose to say FRWR. Sorry for any
confusion!

Tom.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ