[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180924113108.834031655@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 13:52:07 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Julian Wiedmann <jwi@...ux.ibm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 040/111] s390/qeth: reset layer2 attribute on layer switch
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@...ux.ibm.com>
[ Upstream commit 70551dc46ffa3555a0b5f3545b0cd87ab67fd002 ]
After the subdriver's remove() routine has completed, the card's layer
mode is undetermined again. Reflect this in the layer2 field.
If qeth_dev_layer2_store() hits an error after remove() was called, the
card _always_ requires a setup(), even if the previous layer mode is
requested again.
But qeth_dev_layer2_store() bails out early if the requested layer mode
still matches the current one. So unless we reset the layer2 field,
re-probing the card back to its previous mode is currently not possible.
Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_sys.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_sys.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_sys.c
@@ -423,6 +423,7 @@ static ssize_t qeth_dev_layer2_store(str
if (card->discipline) {
card->discipline->remove(card->gdev);
qeth_core_free_discipline(card);
+ card->options.layer2 = -1;
}
rc = qeth_core_load_discipline(card, newdis);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists