linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 047/111] RDMA/cma: Protect cma dev list with lock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180924113109.746674313@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 24 Sep 2018 13:52:14 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Parav Pandit <parav@...lanox.com>,
        Daniel Jurgens <danielj@...lanox.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>,
        Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...el.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 047/111] RDMA/cma: Protect cma dev list with lock

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Parav Pandit <parav@...lanox.com>

commit 954a8e3aea87e896e320cf648c1a5bbe47de443e upstream.

When AF_IB addresses are used during rdma_resolve_addr() a lock is not
held. A cma device can get removed while list traversal is in progress
which may lead to crash. ie

        CPU0                                     CPU1
        ====                                     ====
rdma_resolve_addr()
 cma_resolve_ib_dev()
  list_for_each()                         cma_remove_one()
    cur_dev->device                        mutex_lock(&lock)
                                            list_del();
                                           mutex_unlock(&lock);
                                           cma_process_remove();


Therefore, hold a lock while traversing the list which avoids such
situation.

Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 3.10
Fixes: f17df3b0dede ("RDMA/cma: Add support for AF_IB to rdma_resolve_addr()")
Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit <parav@...lanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Jurgens <danielj@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c |   12 +++++++-----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c
@@ -673,6 +673,7 @@ static int cma_resolve_ib_dev(struct rdm
 	dgid = (union ib_gid *) &addr->sib_addr;
 	pkey = ntohs(addr->sib_pkey);
 
+	mutex_lock(&lock);
 	list_for_each_entry(cur_dev, &dev_list, list) {
 		for (p = 1; p <= cur_dev->device->phys_port_cnt; ++p) {
 			if (!rdma_cap_af_ib(cur_dev->device, p))
@@ -696,18 +697,19 @@ static int cma_resolve_ib_dev(struct rdm
 					cma_dev = cur_dev;
 					sgid = gid;
 					id_priv->id.port_num = p;
+					goto found;
 				}
 			}
 		}
 	}
-
-	if (!cma_dev)
-		return -ENODEV;
+	mutex_unlock(&lock);
+	return -ENODEV;
 
 found:
 	cma_attach_to_dev(id_priv, cma_dev);
-	addr = (struct sockaddr_ib *) cma_src_addr(id_priv);
-	memcpy(&addr->sib_addr, &sgid, sizeof sgid);
+	mutex_unlock(&lock);
+	addr = (struct sockaddr_ib *)cma_src_addr(id_priv);
+	memcpy(&addr->sib_addr, &sgid, sizeof(sgid));
 	cma_translate_ib(addr, &id_priv->id.route.addr.dev_addr);
 	return 0;
 }