[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180924121138.GN15943@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 15:11:38 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Arend van Spriel <aspriel@...il.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] clk: pmc-atom: use devm_kstrdup_const()
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 01:44:19PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> pon., 24 wrz 2018 o 13:23 Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> napisaĆ(a):
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 12:11:50PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > Use devm_kstrdup_const() in the pmc-atom driver. This mostly serves as
> > > an example of how to use this new routine to shrink driver code.
> > >
> > > While we're at it: replace a call to kcalloc() with devm_kcalloc().
> >
> > > @@ -352,8 +344,6 @@ static int plt_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > goto err_drop_mclk;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - plt_clk_free_parent_names_loop(parent_names, data->nparents);
> > > -
> > > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, data);
> > > return 0;
> >
> > I don't think this is a good example.
> >
> > You changed a behaviour here in the way that you keep all chunks of memory
> > (even small enough for pointers) during entire life time of the driver, which
> > pretty likely would be forever till next boot.
> >
> > In the original case the memory was freed immediately in probe either it fails
> > or returns with success.
> >
> > NAK, sorry.
> >
> >
>
> I see.
>
> I'd like to still merge patches 1-3 and then I'd come up with better
> examples for the next release cycle once these are in?
I'm fine with first three, though I can't come up with better example for you
now. My previous comment solely to clk-pmc-atom code.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists