[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180924121128.5983-3-ebiederm@xmission.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 14:11:27 +0200
From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: [REVIEW][PATCH 3/4] signal/arm: Use send_sig_fault where appropriate
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
---
arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c | 11 +++--------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c b/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
index dc7e6b50ef67..aa96cc5c9fe9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
+++ b/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
@@ -216,13 +216,6 @@ static struct notifier_block vfp_notifier_block = {
*/
static void vfp_raise_sigfpe(unsigned int sicode, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
- siginfo_t info;
-
- clear_siginfo(&info);
- info.si_signo = SIGFPE;
- info.si_code = sicode;
- info.si_addr = (void __user *)(instruction_pointer(regs) - 4);
-
/*
* This is the same as NWFPE, because it's not clear what
* this is used for
@@ -230,7 +223,9 @@ static void vfp_raise_sigfpe(unsigned int sicode, struct pt_regs *regs)
current->thread.error_code = 0;
current->thread.trap_no = 6;
- send_sig_info(SIGFPE, &info, current);
+ send_sig_fault(SIGFPE, sicode,
+ (void __user *)(instruction_pointer(regs) - 4),
+ current);
}
static void vfp_panic(char *reason, u32 inst)
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists