linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.14 154/173] blk-mq: only attempt to merge bio if there is rq in sw queue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180924113126.619573489@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 24 Sep 2018 13:53:08 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Laurence Oberman <loberman@...hat.com>,
        Omar Sandoval <osandov@...com>,
        Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@....com>,
        Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@...adcom.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 154/173] blk-mq: only attempt to merge bio if there is rq in sw queue

4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>

[ Upstream commit b04f50ab8a74129b3041a2836c33c916be3c6667 ]

Only attempt to merge bio iff the ctx->rq_list isn't empty, because:

1) for high-performance SSD, most of times dispatch may succeed, then
there may be nothing left in ctx->rq_list, so don't try to merge over
sw queue if it is empty, then we can save one acquiring of ctx->lock

2) we can't expect good merge performance on per-cpu sw queue, and missing
one merge on sw queue won't be a big deal since tasks can be scheduled from
one CPU to another.

Cc: Laurence Oberman <loberman@...hat.com>
Cc: Omar Sandoval <osandov@...com>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@....com>
Tested-by: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@...adcom.com>
Reported-by: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@...adcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 block/blk-mq-sched.c |    3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/block/blk-mq-sched.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
@@ -236,7 +236,8 @@ bool __blk_mq_sched_bio_merge(struct req
 		return e->type->ops.mq.bio_merge(hctx, bio);
 	}
 
-	if (hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_SHOULD_MERGE) {
+	if ((hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_SHOULD_MERGE) &&
+			!list_empty_careful(&ctx->rq_list)) {
 		/* default per sw-queue merge */
 		spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
 		ret = blk_mq_attempt_merge(q, ctx, bio);