[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWST+PJM8EChBpbToycmXWyt6icNM0x6H9FWtHOMQK7aQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 09:01:19 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: firoz.khan@...aro.org
Cc: linux-m68k <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
y2038 Mailman List <y2038@...ts.linaro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>,
marcin.juszkiewicz@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] m68k: Replace NR_syscalls macro from asm/unistd.h
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 5:06 PM Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@...aro.org> wrote:
> NR_syscalls macro holds the number of system call exist in m68k
> architecture. This macro is currently the part of asm/unistd.h file.
> We have to change the value of NR_syscalls, if we add or delete a
> system call.
>
> One of patch in this patch series has a script which will generate
> a uapi header based on syscall.tbl file. The syscall.tbl file
> contains the number of system call information. So we have two
> option to update NR_syscalls value.
>
> 1. Update NR_syscalls in asm/unistd.h manually by counting the
> no.of system calls. No need to update NR_syscalls untill
> we either add a new system call or delete an existing system
> call.
>
> 2. We can keep this feature it above mentioned script, that'll
> count the number of syscalls and keep it in a generated file.
> In this case we don't need to explicitly update NR_syscalls
> in asm/unistd.h file.
>
> The 2nd option will be the recommended one. For that, I come up
> with another macro - __NR_syscalls which will be updated by the
> script and it will be present in api/asm/unistd.h. While __NR_syscalls
> isn't strictly part of the uapi, having it as part of the generated
> header to simplifies the implementation. So we need to enclose this
> macro with #ifdef __KERNEL__ to avoid side effects.
>
> Signed-off-by: Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@...aro.org>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists