lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWST+PJM8EChBpbToycmXWyt6icNM0x6H9FWtHOMQK7aQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 24 Sep 2018 09:01:19 +0200
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     firoz.khan@...aro.org
Cc:     linux-m68k <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
        y2038 Mailman List <y2038@...ts.linaro.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>,
        marcin.juszkiewicz@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] m68k: Replace NR_syscalls macro from asm/unistd.h

On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 5:06 PM Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@...aro.org> wrote:
> NR_syscalls macro holds the number of system call exist in m68k
> architecture. This macro is currently the part of asm/unistd.h file.
> We have to change the value of NR_syscalls, if we add or delete a
> system call.
>
> One of patch in this patch series has a script which will generate
> a uapi header based on syscall.tbl file. The syscall.tbl file
> contains the number of system call information. So we have two
> option to update NR_syscalls value.
>
> 1. Update NR_syscalls in asm/unistd.h manually by counting the
>    no.of system calls. No need to update NR_syscalls untill
>    we either add a new system call or delete an existing system
>    call.
>
> 2. We can keep this feature it above mentioned script, that'll
>    count the number of syscalls and keep it in a generated file.
>    In this case we don't need to explicitly update NR_syscalls
>    in asm/unistd.h file.
>
> The 2nd option will be the recommended one. For that, I come up
> with another macro - __NR_syscalls which will be updated by the
> script and it will be present in api/asm/unistd.h. While __NR_syscalls
> isn't strictly part of the uapi, having it as part of the generated
> header to simplifies the implementation. So we need to enclose this
> macro with #ifdef __KERNEL__ to avoid side effects.
>
> Signed-off-by: Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@...aro.org>

Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ