linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.18 012/235] tcp: really ignore MSG_ZEROCOPY if no SO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180924113105.617367236@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 24 Sep 2018 13:49:58 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.18 012/235] tcp: really ignore MSG_ZEROCOPY if no SO_ZEROCOPY

4.18-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com>

[ Upstream commit 5cf4a8532c992bb22a9ecd5f6d93f873f4eaccc2 ]

According to the documentation in msg_zerocopy.rst, the SO_ZEROCOPY
flag was introduced because send(2) ignores unknown message flags and
any legacy application which was accidentally passing the equivalent of
MSG_ZEROCOPY earlier should not see any new behaviour.

Before commit f214f915e7db ("tcp: enable MSG_ZEROCOPY"), a send(2) call
which passed the equivalent of MSG_ZEROCOPY without setting SO_ZEROCOPY
would succeed.  However, after that commit, it fails with -ENOBUFS.  So
it appears that the SO_ZEROCOPY flag fails to fulfill its intended
purpose.  Fix it.

Fixes: f214f915e7db ("tcp: enable MSG_ZEROCOPY")
Signed-off-by: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com>
Acked-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 net/core/skbuff.c |    3 ---
 net/ipv4/tcp.c    |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -939,9 +939,6 @@ struct ubuf_info *sock_zerocopy_alloc(st
 
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(!in_task());
 
-	if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_ZEROCOPY))
-		return NULL;
-
 	skb = sock_omalloc(sk, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!skb)
 		return NULL;
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
@@ -1186,7 +1186,7 @@ int tcp_sendmsg_locked(struct sock *sk,
 
 	flags = msg->msg_flags;
 
-	if (flags & MSG_ZEROCOPY && size) {
+	if (flags & MSG_ZEROCOPY && size && sock_flag(sk, SOCK_ZEROCOPY)) {
 		if (sk->sk_state != TCP_ESTABLISHED) {
 			err = -EINVAL;
 			goto out_err;