linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 0/3] powerpc: Detection and scheduler optimization for POWER9 bigcore

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f2ac8eb0-b28e-a930-0160-09720f73a297@intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 25 Sep 2018 15:16:30 -0700
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:     "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>,
        Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Akshay Adiga <akshay.adiga@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@...il.com>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        Murilo Opsfelder Araujo <muriloo@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/3] powerpc: Detection and scheduler optimization for
 POWER9 bigcore

On 09/22/2018 04:03 AM, Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
> Without this patchset, the SMT domain would be defined as the group of
> threads that share L2 cache.

Could you try to make a more clear, concise statement about the current
state of the art vs. what you want it to be?  Right now, the sched
domains do something like this in terms of ordering:

1. SMT siblings
2. Caches
3. NUMA

It sounds like you don't want SMT siblings to be the things that we use,
right?  Because some siblings share caches and some do not.  Right?  You
want something like this:

1. SMT siblings (sharing L1)
2. SMT siblings (sharing L2)
3. Other caches
4. NUMA