[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180925224613.GI2933@thunk.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 18:46:13 -0400
From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@...band.pl>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
Alan Cox <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
焦晓冬 <milestonejxd@...il.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rogier Wolff <R.E.Wolff@...Wizard.nl>
Subject: Re: POSIX violation by writeback error
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 07:35:11PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> Isn't this what the snippet for O_TMPFILE in "man 2 open" does?:
>
> char path[PATH_MAX];
> fd = open("/path/to/dir", O_TMPFILE | O_RDWR,
> S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR);
>
> /* File I/O on 'fd'... */
>
> snprintf(path, PATH_MAX, "/proc/self/fd/%d", fd);
> linkat(AT_FDCWD, path, AT_FDCWD, "/path/for/file",
> AT_SYMLINK_FOLLOW);
Huh. I stand corrected. I had assumed O_TMPFILE worked like any
other file where the link count was zero, and linkat(2) wouldn't allow
this. But obviously, this does work. In fact, from the linkat(2) man
page, using:
linkat(fd, NULL, AT_FDCWD, "/path/for/file", AT_EMPTY_PATH);
is an even simpler way that doesn't /proc being mounted.
TIL...
- Ted
Powered by blists - more mailing lists