[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180925115547.yd6bm5amzqsgwnrx@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 13:55:47 +0200
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Cc: zhe.he@...driver.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] printk: Fix panic caused by passing log_buf_len
to command line
On Tue 2018-09-25 20:38:40, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (09/22/18 23:40), zhe.he@...driver.com wrote:
> > @@ -1048,7 +1048,14 @@ static void __init log_buf_len_update(unsigned size)
> > /* save requested log_buf_len since it's too early to process it */
> > static int __init log_buf_len_setup(char *str)
> > {
> > - unsigned size = memparse(str, &str);
> > + unsigned int size;
> > +
> > + if (!str) {
> > + pr_err("boot command line parameter value not provided\n");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
>
> Hmm, I thought we agreed on dropping this error print out. It's not exactly
> useful; we still have the default buffer size.
Yeah, we should either use a better message or drop it. I am fine with both
solutions.
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists