[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180925120933.54xd72sv65d63tkl@8bytes.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 14:09:34 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>
Cc: andy.gross@...aro.org, will.deacon@....com, robin.murphy@....com,
bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, david.brown@...aro.org,
tfiga@...omium.org, swboyd@...omium.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, robdclark@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Qcom smmu-500 TLB invalidation errata for sdm845
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 11:55:47AM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> Vivek Gautam (4):
> firmware: qcom_scm-64: Add atomic version of qcom_scm_call
> firmware/qcom_scm: Add atomic version of io read/write APIs
> firmware/qcom_scm: Add scm call to handle smmu errata
> iommu/arm-smmu: Add support to handle Qcom's TLBI serialization errata
>
> drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-32.c | 17 ++++
> drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-64.c | 181 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c | 18 ++++
> drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.h | 9 ++
> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-regs.h | 2 +
> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 133 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/linux/qcom_scm.h | 6 ++
> 7 files changed, 320 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
Should this go through the iommu-tree? In that case I need Acked-by's
for the firmware code changes.
Regards,
Joerg
Powered by blists - more mailing lists