[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878t3p4vdr.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 22:25:04 +1000
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@...aro.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, linuxram@...ibm.com,
leitao@...ian.org, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
gregkh <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
y2038 Mailman List <y2038@...ts.linaro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>,
Marcin Juszkiewicz <marcin.juszkiewicz@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] powerpc: Add system call table generation support
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 2:48 AM Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> wrote:
>> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> writes:
>> > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 2:15 PM Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@...aro.org> wrote:
>> >> On 14 September 2018 at 15:31, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>> >> > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 10:33 AM Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@...aro.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > But all three existing architectures (x86, s390 and arm) already
>> > have the capability to parse the table and generate different output
>> > from that.
>>
>> Yeah, we want that on powerpc too.
>>
>> If the script needs to be more complex that's fine, if it can't be
>> shared across arches that's fine, the main thing for me is that wiring
>> up a syscall can be done by adding a single line in a single file.
>
> Yes, that's definitely the idea, we want to make it easier for everyone.
> We need at least a special case for mips, which needs three separate
> input files (the tables are completely different) to generate four versions
> of the output, plus a future extension to use the generic table for their
> new one.
>
> For powerpc, I'm hoping that both the table format and script can be
> completely generic and not need a special case that is different
> from the others, but if we need some extra magic to handle the SPU
> syscalls, we can still do that with a private script.
Sounds good.
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists